Company Directory › Robotics › Embodied AI & Robot Software › Realtime Robotics vs RideFlux

Realtime Robotics vs RideFlux

Realtime Robotics and RideFlux are both embodied ai & robot software companies. Their verified profiles differ on headquarters, country, industry focus, founding year and markets served. The table below sets out only those rows; everything else is on each company's own profile. Facts verified 9 November 2026.

Where they differ

Company Realtime Robotics RideFlux
Headquarters Boston, Massachusetts, United States Jeju City, Jeju, South Korea
Country United States South Korea
Industry Platforms & Software — Embodied AI & Robot Software; industrial AI for robotic motion planning Platforms & Software — Embodied AI & Robot Software; autonomous driving AI software
Founded 2016 2018
Markets served Global; automotive, manufacturing and logistics robotic workcells South Korea; autonomous mobility services and freight transport

How Realtime Robotics and RideFlux differ

Realtime Robotics is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, United States, while RideFlux is headquartered in Jeju City, Jeju, South Korea, with a Seoul office in Yeongdeungpo-gu. Their founding dates differ: Realtime Robotics was founded in March 2016, company-stated in its own press releases, while RideFlux was founded in 2018. On industry, Realtime Robotics works in embodied AI and robot software through industrial AI for robotic motion planning and optimisation. RideFlux works in the same category through autonomous driving AI software. Their markets differ in setting and geography. Realtime Robotics serves global automotive, manufacturing and logistics robotic workcells. RideFlux serves South Korea, covering autonomous mobility services and freight transport. Public funding records differ in basis and listing status. Realtime Robotics is private, with cumulative funding of approximately $69M per a Forge Global round-by-round sum, while database totals range higher and the conservative figure is used in the record. RideFlux is private, with cumulative funding of KRW 88.2B, approximately $64M; a preliminary KOSDAQ listing review filed on 14 August 2026 remains under review, so it is not yet listed. Buyers optimising industrial robot workcells should read Realtime Robotics; buyers evaluating Korean autonomous mobility software should read RideFlux.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Realtime Robotics and RideFlux?

Realtime Robotics is based in Boston, Massachusetts, United States and RideFlux in Jeju City, Jeju, South Korea; they also differ on country, industry focus, founding year, markets served. The table above sets out both companies' entries row by row.

Are Realtime Robotics and RideFlux in the same country?

No. Realtime Robotics is based in Boston, Massachusetts, United States and RideFlux in Jeju City, Jeju, South Korea.

Can one sourcing request reach both Realtime Robotics and RideFlux?

Yes. Realtime Robotics can be reached through rtr.ai and RideFlux through rideflux.com, or post one sourcing request and let both answer if they fit.

Does GlobleMatch rank Realtime Robotics above RideFlux, or RideFlux above Realtime Robotics?

Neither. There is no pay-to-rank and no paid placement in comparisons; order and content come from verified profile facts only.

Sourcing from embodied ai & robot software companies?

Post your request once and receive answers from matching suppliers, including Realtime Robotics and RideFlux. The choice comes down to geography and product range — the table above shows where each one stands. Posting is free for buyers.

Post a sourcing request

Run Realtime Robotics or RideFlux? Claim your free profile to keep your facts current.

Full profiles, with every fact and its source: Realtime Robotics and RideFlux. Profile facts last verified: Realtime Robotics on 10 November 2026, RideFlux on 9 November 2026.