Company Directory › Robotics › End Effectors & Dexterous Hands › qbrobotics vs Roboligent
qbrobotics vs Roboligent
qbrobotics and Roboligent are both end effectors & dexterous hands companies. Their verified profiles differ on headquarters, country, industry focus, founding year, company size and markets served. The table below sets out only those rows; everything else is on each company's own profile. Facts verified 6 November 2026.
Where they differ
| Company | qbrobotics | Roboligent |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Cascina | Austin / Round Rock, Texas, United States |
| Country | Italy | United States |
| Industry | Robotic end-effectors — soft-robotics hands, grippers and variable-stiffness actuators | Components — End Effectors & Dexterous Hands; compliant force-controlled actuation and Physical AI robots (listed in this category in the assignment) |
| Founded | 2011 | 2016 |
| Company size | About 25 employees (company-stated) | — (not publicly disclosed; left blank rather than guessed) |
| Markets served | Global; research institutes, universities and industrial customers worldwide, including distribution through the Universal Robots UR+ programme | Logistics and fulfilment, automotive and manufacturing, and electronics, display and semiconductor operations, initially in the United States |
How qbrobotics and Roboligent differ
Soft-robotics hands from Italy meet compliant actuation and Physical AI robots from Texas. qbrobotics, headquartered in Cascina, Italy, was founded in 2011 as a spin-off of the University of Pisa and the Italian Institute of Technology, and designs robotic hands, grippers and variable-stiffness actuators based on soft synergies, serving research institutes, universities and industrial customers worldwide, including through the Universal Robots UR+ programme. Roboligent, based in Austin and Round Rock, Texas, in the United States, was founded in 2016 company-stated on its official site, designs its hardware, control software and AI in-house, serving logistics and fulfilment, automotive and manufacturing, and electronics, display and semiconductor operations, initially in the United States. Headcount appears only for qbrobotics, at about 25 employees, company-stated; Roboligent does not publicly disclose its company size. Funding disclosure also differs. qbrobotics, a privately held company, publishes no public funding total, although it has taken part in publicly supported projects. Roboligent is private, with cumulative funding put at US$3.61 million by CB Insights and US$5.03 million including grants by PitchBook, and both readings stand. A research team sourcing soft grippers and hands reads qbrobotics' record; an operations team evaluating compliant robots for fulfilment or manufacturing reads Roboligent's.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between qbrobotics and Roboligent?
qbrobotics is based in Cascina and Roboligent in Austin / Round Rock, Texas, United States; they also differ on country, industry focus, founding year, company size, markets served. The table above sets out both companies' entries row by row.
Are qbrobotics and Roboligent in the same country?
No. qbrobotics is based in Cascina and Roboligent in Austin / Round Rock, Texas, United States.
Can one sourcing request reach both qbrobotics and Roboligent?
Yes. qbrobotics can be reached through qbrobotics.com and Roboligent through roboligent.com, or post one sourcing request and let both answer if they fit.
Does GlobleMatch rank qbrobotics above Roboligent, or Roboligent above qbrobotics?
Neither. There is no pay-to-rank and no paid placement in comparisons; order and content come from verified profile facts only.
Run qbrobotics or Roboligent? Claim your free profile to keep your facts current.
Full profiles, with every fact and its source: qbrobotics and Roboligent. Profile facts last verified: qbrobotics on 6 November 2026, Roboligent on 10 November 2026.