Company Directory › Robotics › End Effectors & Dexterous Hands › Kitagawa Corporation vs PaXini
Kitagawa Corporation vs PaXini
Kitagawa Corporation and PaXini are both end effectors & dexterous hands companies. Their verified profiles differ on headquarters, country, industry focus, founding year, company size and markets served. The table below sets out only those rows; everything else is on each company's own profile. Facts verified 6 November 2026.
Where they differ
| Company | Kitagawa Corporation | PaXini |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Fuchu, Hiroshima, Japan | Shenzhen, Guangdong, China |
| Country | Japan | China |
| Industry | Components — End Effectors & Dexterous Hands | Robotics components and robots — multi-dimensional tactile sensors, tactile dexterous hands and tactile humanoid robots |
| Founded | March 1918 | 2021 |
| Company size | 1,364 employees, non-consolidated, as of 31 March 2019 (dated figure from its official company information; no current total published on the pages opened) | — (not publicly disclosed; left blank rather than guessed) |
| Markets served | Global machine tool and manufacturing markets through subsidiaries and offices in the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific | China nationwide (Shenzhen, Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Wuhan, Suqian) and overseas via official online flagship stores and an overseas sales channel |
How Kitagawa Corporation and PaXini differ
A century separates these founding dates. Kitagawa Corporation was founded in March 1918, company-stated on its official about page, in Fuchu, Hiroshima, Japan, where it remains headquartered; PaXini was founded in 2021 and is headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. Kitagawa's relevance here runs through machine tool accessories, whose gripping and workholding technology applies to robot end effectors. PaXini specialises in touch for embodied AI, building multi-dimensional tactile sensing around its proprietary HAPTA architecture and ITPU processing units, with PX-series six-axis force and torque sensors, tactile dexterous hands and tactile humanoid robots. Kitagawa serves global machine tool markets through subsidiaries in the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific, reporting 1,364 employees, non-consolidated, as of 31 March 2019; PaXini serves China nationwide, including Shenzhen, Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Wuhan and Suqian, plus overseas channels, and does not publicly disclose its size. Funding presents two unreconciled readings for PaXini: the company reports more than RMB 4 billion cumulative after a September 2026 Series B++ round, while CB Insights aggregates about US$293M from individually announced rounds. Kitagawa, by contrast, is listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Workholding buyers read Kitagawa's record; teams building tactile perception into robots read PaXini's.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between Kitagawa Corporation and PaXini?
Kitagawa Corporation is based in Fuchu, Hiroshima, Japan and PaXini in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China; they also differ on country, industry focus, founding year, company size, markets served. The table above sets out both companies' entries row by row.
Are Kitagawa Corporation and PaXini in the same country?
No. Kitagawa Corporation is based in Fuchu, Hiroshima, Japan and PaXini in Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Can one sourcing request reach both Kitagawa Corporation and PaXini?
Yes. Kitagawa Corporation can be reached through kitagawa.com and PaXini through paxini.com, or post one sourcing request and let both answer if they fit.
Does GlobleMatch rank Kitagawa Corporation above PaXini, or PaXini above Kitagawa Corporation?
Neither. There is no pay-to-rank and no paid placement in comparisons; order and content come from verified profile facts only.
Run Kitagawa Corporation or PaXini? Claim your free profile to keep your facts current.
Full profiles, with every fact and its source: Kitagawa Corporation and PaXini. Profile facts last verified: Kitagawa Corporation on 9 November 2026, PaXini on 6 November 2026.